MINELRES: ERRC: Action to Stop Forced Evictions in Romania
[email protected]
[email protected]
Fri Nov 3 20:01:26 2006
Original sender: European Roma Rights Centre <[email protected]>
Prime Minister Urged to Intervene to Prevent Serious Human Rights Abuses
Budapest, Bucharest, 31 October 2006. The
European Roma Rights Centre (ERRC) and the
Romanian Helsinki Committee have sent a letter to
Romanian Prime Minister Popescu-Tariceanu, urging
him to intervene to prevent serial human rights
abuses as a result of the actions of the Tulcea
municipality. The case concerns the forced
eviction of a large number of Romani families in
Tulcea, as well as durable and credible threats
to carry out further forced evictions in the next
days. The letter was copied to a number of other
agencies, including Romanian government
officials, as well as relevant United Nations,
European Union and Council of Europe desks.
The full text of the letter concerning the Tulcea evictions follows
here:
Honourable Prime Minister Popescu-Tariceanu,
We write to you to express our deep concern in
relation to the recent forced eviction of around
110 Romani individuals in Tulcea, Romania. This
action is the latest and the most grave in a
series of similar racially tainted incidents,
with the eviction of another Romani family from
social housing owned by local authorities in Tulcea being imminent.
The European Roma Rights Centre (ERRC) is an
international public interest law organization
aimed at combating anti-Romani racism and human
rights violations against Roma. The Association
for the Defence of Human Rights in Romania - the
Helsinki Committee (APADOR-CH) is a
non-governmental not-for-profit organization,
affiliated with the International Helsinki
Federation for Human Rights and aimed at changing
the society and its institutions towards a
democratic culture, based on the respect of human rights.
The 25 families, comprising approximately 110
individuals, were evicted just before noon on 11
October from a building situated in Tulcea at 5
Alunisului Street, a building they had occupied
for the previous seven years. The eviction took
place after the Tulcea Tribunal handed down a
judgment in August this year allowing the request
of the building's present owner to have the occupants evicted.
Eighteen of the families (approximately 80
people) evicted from Alunisului Street had no
alternative but to accept the lease contracts
offered by the Municipality for rooms in two
derelict buildings situated four kilometers away
from the town, in an enclave inside the Tulcea
industrial port. These highly inadequate
structures were the sole arrangements made for
alternate shelter. A number of heavy industries
are located in that area. Notably, right next to
the buildings occupied by the Roma, ships
carrying bauxite ore are unloaded and the ore is
transported to a nearby storage facility with
heavy open trucks. As a result everything in the
area is covered with red dust that makes
breathing difficult. Three people were already
taken by ambulances to the hospital, complaining
of skin problems, lung pain, and other ailments.
Besides the imminent danger to health for any
people forced to live there, the new location is
far from all communal facilities such as schools,
hospitals, churches, shops, etc. After their
relocation, the children in the 'colony' stopped
going to school because of the distance and
because their parents feared for their safety.
The two buildings are in an advanced state of
disrepair, with no access to electricity, hot
water, sanitation and only limited access to
drinking water, from a tap located outside.
The rest of the people evicted from Alunisului
Street, for whom there was not enough room in the
buildings in the industrial port or who refused
to move there, were left sleeping rough in the
streets outside the building on Alunisului
Street. Seven families, comprising approximately
thirty people, including infants and old people
have had to sleep outside for the last two weeks
in temperatures that went as low as 0�C during
nighttime. As a result of efforts by local
activists and a representative of the ERRC, a
tent was provided by the Red Cross for these people, as a
temporary solution.
Despite this humanitarian crisis, the local
authorities have refused to respond to the pleas
for help launched by the Roma and their
representatives. The solution they offered with
regard to those people rendered homeless by the
eviction was to move them to mobile housing
located outside Tulcea, also in a heavily
industrialized area. However, as the authorities
themselves have acknowledged, these structures
offer little more than very limited shelter since
they cannot be connected to any utilities. Given
the coming winter, these cabins are uninhabitable.
Furthermore, other forced evictions are slated to
take place in the coming days in Tulcea, with a
Romani family of three due to be evicted from
social housing without adequate alternative
accommodation. While authorities invoke the
shortage of available social housing at their
disposal, there is considerable evidence
indicating numerous abuses in the way in which
social houses were distributed, with the Roma
being the most obvious victims in the process.
The eviction that took place on 11 October is the
high point of a cycle of neglect and deprivation
lasting for more than seven years. Most of the
families evicted last week used to live in
informal housing on Plugarilor Street in Tulcea.
When their houses burnt down due to a faulty
electrical installation in August 1999, they were
left to sleep under the open sky among the
charred ruins for months on end. Under pressure
to find a solution, the municipality identified
an empty building on Alunisului No. 5, abandoned
at the time by its owner, and reportedly
explicitly encouraged the homeless Roma to occupy
it until a more permanent arrangement could be
found. At the same time, the Roma made numerous
requests for social housing, most of which remained unresolved to this
day.
The Roma from Plugarilor moved to the building on
Alunisului in 1999. Over the years, other Romani
families left homeless for a variety of reasons
moved in the building sometimes with the explicit
involvement of the Municipality. The Roma never
had security of tenure over the rooms in the
building on Alunisului, although they paid
utilities regularly. Over the years, the living
conditions in the building deteriorated markedly,
under pressure from overcrowding and lack of
maintenance. The local authorities were aware of
the unsustainable situation in Alunisului, but
generally refused to undertake any actions aimed
at regularizing the Roma's situation in the
building. The former owner of the building even
offered to donate the building to the
authorities, but this offer was turned down for
unknown reasons. Eventually, the owner sold the
building for a derisory sum to another company based in Tulcea.
The new owner initiated eviction proceedings, and
obtained a favorable judgment. On 20 August 2005,
the Romani families from Alunisului were
forcefully evicted from their flats, and had to
spend almost four months in the open air. Some of
them returned to the remains of their houses in
Plugarilor, others squatted in parks, gardens,
and other public spaces. A small number of
families built mud houses on a plot of private
land outside Tulcea, where they live in extreme
conditions to the present day, and could face
eviction at any time, due to the lack of any
title over their houses and the land on which they are built.
Following the decision of a higher court to
reverse the lower court's judgment for procedural
flaws, most of the Roma returned to the building
in Alunisului in October 2005. However, their
living was again disrupted by a new set of legal
proceedings that resulted in the second forced eviction referred to
above.
Honourable Prime Minister Popescu-Tariceanu,
The actions and omissions of the local
authorities in Tulcea over the last seven years
amount to a gross violation of Romania's
obligations under international human rights law.
Most notably, Romania is bound by the
International Covenant on Economic, Social and
Cultural Rights (ICESCR), which states, at
Article 11(1), "The States Parties to the present
Covenant recognise the right of everyone to an
adequate standard of living for himself and his
family, including adequate food, clothing and
housing, and to the continuous improvement of
living conditions. The States Parties will take
appropriate steps to ensure the realisation of
this right, recognising to this effect the
essential importance of international
co-operation based on free consent." The
Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights
has held that forced evictions constitute a
primary harm in the context of Article 11. An
eviction is "forced" and therefore illegal under
international human rights law if: (i) due
process is not observed; (ii) alternate
accommodation is not provided; and/or (iii) any
form of discrimination infects procedures or
outcomes. In these terms, the Tulcea evictions are evidently illegal.
In addition, the Romanian authorities' actions
run afoul of a number of provisions of the
European Convention on Human Rights providing
protections against forced evictions and other
core elements of the right to adequate housing.
Article 8(1) of the European Convention on Human
Rights sets forth the following guarantees:
"Everyone has the right to respect for his
private and family life, his home and his
correspondence." Article 8's protection
encompasses inter alia the following rights: the
right of access, the right of occupation, and the
right not to be expelled or evicted, and is thus
intimately intertwined with the principle of
legal security of tenure. Further, the European
Court has developed extensively under its Article
8 jurisprudence the concept of "positive
obligations", under which a Contracting State
must not only restrict its own interferences to
what is compatible with Article 8, but may also
be required to protect the enjoyment of those
rights and secure the respect for those rights in
its domestic law. In addition, protections
available under Article 1 of Protocol 1 to the
European Convention -- guaranteeing the peaceful
enjoyment of one's possessions -- have been
interpreted to include the protection of housing
rights. In some circumstances, forced evictions
and extreme housing conditions may rise to the
level of cruel and degrading treatment or
punishment, as banned under Article 3 of the Convention.
The Romanian Government was in fact recently
found in breach of a number of articles of the
European Convention of Human Rights in the
Moldovan and Others v. Romania(1) case, which
involved inter alia severely overcrowded and
unsanitary environment and its detrimental effect
on the health and well-being of the persons
concerned, as well as evident racial animus on
the part of authorities, both elements present in Tulcea.
Honourable Prime Minister Popescu-Tariceanu,
The ERRC and APADOR-CH urge you to exert your
power to ensure that the urgent housing needs of
these evicted families are addressed immediately,
before forced evictions forthwith. It is
imperative that these families are provided with an adequate
housing solution.
In particular, with regard to the families that
presently live in the industrial port, it is
vital that they be urgently provided with
adequate alternative accommodation in a safe
area. Until such solution is found, the two
buildings in the industrial port should be
brought to a level which would make possible
human habitation. Moreover, public transport to
this area should be urgently provided.
With regard to the persons rendered homeless by
the eviction, it is urgent that they are provided
with adequate accommodation. This should be the
highest priority of local and central
administration, given the impending winter, and
their rapidly deteriorating health.
We also urge that your office initiates the
necessary steps in accordance with the law to see
that those responsible for the plight of the
families evicted from Alunisului Street are
brought to justice for their actions.
Finally, we would welcome discussion with your
office on these matters. Thank you in advance for all efforts in
this regard.
Sincerely,
Dimitrina Petrova
Executive Director
European Roma Rights Centre
Diana-Olivia Calinescu
Executive Director
Romanian Helsinki Committee (APADOR-CH)
Persons wishing to express similar concerns are urged to contact:
Mr. Calin Popescu-Tariceanu
Prime Minister of Romania
Piata Victoriei, nr. 1, sector 1
Bucuresti
Romania
Fax: + 40-21-318 11 45
Cc.: Mr. Constantin Hogea
Mayor of Tulcea
Str. Pacii nr. 20
Tulcea, Romania
Fax +40 240 517736
NOTE
(1) Moldovan and others v. Romania, Applications
Nos. 41138/98 and 64320/01, Judgment No. 2, 12
July 2005. The Court found violations of Articles
3, 6�1, 8, and 14 taken in conjunction with
Articles 6�1 and 8, mainly on account of the
State's failure to redress the consequences of
those incidents and the numerous deficiencies of
the internal legal proceedings undertaken in the case.
------
EUROPEAN ROMA RIGHTS CENTRE
Hungary, Budapest H-1016, Naphegy ter. 8; Tel.:
+36/1/4132200; Fax: 4132201; [email protected]
ROMANIAN HELSINKI COMMITTEE (APADOR-CH)
Str. Nicolae Tonitza 8, Sector 3, Bucuresti,
704012 Romania; Tel.: +40/21/3124528;
Fax: +40/21/3123711;
[email protected]
---------------------------------------------
This message was sent using Endymion MailMan.
http://www.endymion.com/products/mailman/ http://www.microlink.com/