Debate on Nationality in Georgia
Reply-To: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
From: MINELRES moderator <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1999 12:51:26 +0200 (EET)
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Subject: Debate on Nationality in Georgia
From: MINELRES moderator <[email protected]>
Original sender: Felix Corley <[email protected]>
Debate on Nationality in Georgia
Ethnicity Proposal Stirs Debate on Nationality and
Citizenship in Georgia
By Jeremy Bransten
Prague, 22 January 1999 (RFE/RL) -- The re-emergence of nationalism
has been one of the defining features of post-communist societies
across Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union.
But while many national and ethnic conflicts in the area have been
fought as military campaigns during the past decade, some battles are
being waged on paper.
In Georgia, a group of parliamentarians has introduced a bill to
restore the category of "ethnicity" or "nationality" on passports and
identification documents. After the fall of communism, many
post-Soviet states and countries in Eastern Europe, including Georgia,
dropped the ethnicity category, in line with standard Western
practice.
But the idea of re-introducing the classification has fanned
nationalist emotions in Tbilisi and raised concerns among some Western
observers. Antti Korkaakivi, a senior official at the Council of
Europe's Human Rights Division, told RFE/RL this week (Jan. 21) there
is no universal or Europe-wide standard on whether to include
ethnicity as a separate category in personal identification documents.
But he added that he does not know of a single Western European
democracy where this is standard practice.
The Strasbourg-based Council of Europe, which now comprises 40 member
states from East and West, was established 50 years ago to promote
democracy, the rule of law and human rights across the continent.
Georgia, like its neighbors Armenia and Azerbaijan, has special guest
status at the Council and is seeking to join it as a full member.
Korkaakivi says the mandatory inclusion of an ethnicity category on
public documents could violate the Council's newly adopted European
Framework Convention on National Minorities:
"The main rule of the Framework Convention on the protection of
national minorities, which entered into force in early 1998 -- its
main rule and underlying idea is that a person belonging to a national
minority has the freedom, or should have the freedom, to choose to be
treated or not to be treated as such.
"And if there is an ethnicity line included in an identification
document, that should definitely reflect this rule -- i.e., ethnicity
should not in any way be imposed upon a person. If a person does not
want to be treated as a member of a national minority, he or she
should have the right to stay out of that."
In a recent radio speech, Georgian President Eduard Shevardnadze
called for reasoned debate on the ethnicity issue, but he also
indicated he was leaning towards those who favor re-introducing the
category. Shevardnadze said Georgia had its own traditions and it was,
in his words, "not right to follow the West blindly in the matter." He
did not give specific reasons.
But observers warn that Georgia -- a multiethnic state comprising tens
of thousands of Armenians, Ossetians, Kurds, Jews, Abkhaz and other
minorities -- could encourage separatism and discrimination if the
bill becomes law.
Korkaakivi, at the Council of Europe, says a better solution in this
case would be to follow Russia's example. In Soviet times, Russia
maintained a mandatory separate nationality or ethnicity entry in
identification documents, as did all other Soviet republics. But the
line was made voluntary in newly issued Russian passports.
"In the discussion that was going on in the Russian Federation some
time ago, the end result, which was a discretionary ethnicity line,
certainly looks to me like it is much more along the lines of the
ideas underlying the Framework Convention on National Minorities.
Imposed ethnicity is something that is not in line with the
convention."
In some cases, of course, national minorities may wish to be
distinguished from a society's majority -- to ensure that their
specific character and traditions are recognized and valued. But,
Korkaakivi stresses, the guiding principle is that this should be
voluntary. Korkaakivi notes that in his native Finland the Swedish
minority, which comprises about 6 percent of the population, has the
right to use its language in official business. The state also funds
Swedish-language schools and cultural institutions for those who want
to use them. But on their passports, all Finns -- whether ethnic
Swedes or otherwise -- are simply Finnish citizens.
Different countries have different rules on acquiring citizenship. The
United States recognizes the so-called "right of soil," meaning that
anyone born on U.S. territory becomes a citizen regardless of ethnic
origin or parentage. Other countries, such as Germany, derive
citizenship from bloodlines, meaning that someone who is not born in
Germany but can prove ethnic German ancestry is entitled to
citizenship. Others born in Germany but of foreign parents cannot get
immediate citizenship.
Those rules may soon change. The new German leftist government is keen
to amend the country's 80-year-old citizenship laws in order to grant
citizenship to more resident foreigners -- particularly among its more
than two million Turkish residents, many of whom were born in Germany.
But human-rights experts say it does not matter so much what rules a
state uses to determine citizenship. What is important is that, once
citizenship is granted, all citizens are treated the same, without
regard to gender or ethnic identity.
And, as many studies have demonstrated, including a recent survey on
Ukraine by the U.S. Bureau of the Census, ethnic identity is hardly a
scientific or objective measure. It is, to some degree, what people
choose to make it.
The study, entitled "Ethnic Re-identification in Ukraine," showed that
since independence in 1991, a significantly higher proportion of
Ukrainian residents chose to identify themselves as ethnic Ukrainians,
compared to official Soviet statistics back in 1989.
While some of the change was due to ethnic-Russian emigration from
Ukraine, the study shows that if forced to declare a particular ethnic
allegiance, most people will write down what they believe will most
satisfy the authorities. In case they are of mixed ethnic background,
they will tend to identify themselves with the dominant ethnic group
in a country. All the more reason, say human-rights campaigners, to
leave ethnicity off official documents and let people keep it a
private or public matter, as they see fit.
Ukraine, like most post-Soviet states, has since dropped its ethnicity
category.
--
==============================================================
MINELRES - a forum for discussion on minorities in Central&Eastern
Europe
Submissions: [email protected]
Subscription/inquiries: [email protected]
List archive: http://www.riga.lv/minelres/archive.htm
==============================================================